Wikipedia Writing Services That Follow Wikipedia's Rules

Wikipedia is not a directory, and it is not a promotional platform. An article can exist only if the subject is notable, which on Wikipedia means it has received significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. The notability guideline sets out the test.

Your own website, press releases and social profiles do not count, and neither do paid placements or interviews you arranged yourself. Real coverage means independent journalists, books or scholars writing about you in depth. A passing mention in a list does not meet the standard, and ten short mentions rarely add up to one serious profile.

Articles must also be neutral and verifiable. Promotional wording gets removed fast. Wikipedia editors are volunteers, and they can decline a draft, request major changes or delete an article, even after it goes live. No outside company controls that process, and anyone who says otherwise is selling something. Articles about living people and businesses get especially close scrutiny.

Here is where we stand, so there are no surprises. The service is research, drafting and policy advice, not a way around Wikipedia's review.

What we do:

• Check whether your subject appears to meet the notability guideline.
• Audit the independent sources that exist and tell you which are strong or weak.
• Draft a neutral, well-cited article for submission through the proper review route.
• Advise on policy and answer reviewer feedback in line with the rules.
• Keep you informed at each step, in writing, about risks and likely outcomes.

What we will not do:

• Promise that a page will be approved, published or kept.
• Use undisclosed accounts or hidden paid editing.
• Buy or sell edits in ways that break Wikipedia's rules.
• Write promotional material and call it an encyclopedia entry.
• Hide the fact that you are a paying client.

We start here, before any drafting. You send us what you have: press coverage, books, awards, academic citations and anything else published by outside parties, with links or copies where possible. We review it against Wikipedia's expectations for reliable sources,, which favor established newspapers, books and scholarly publishers over blogs and company materials.

Then we report back honestly, in writing. Sometimes the answer is yes and we can move ahead. Often the answer is not yet, and we tell you what independent coverage would need to exist first. In that case we suggest other routes, such as a strong professional bio for your own website or press release writing that can attract real news coverage over time. Press releases do not count as independent sources themselves, but good news pickup can follow. We can also help you shape your story through brand storytelling.

It is better to hear a clear no than to pay for a draft that will be deleted. We would rather lose a sale than send you something that fails.

1. Consultation. We discuss your subject, your goals and what independent coverage already exists, and explain what the work involves.
2. Source audit. We assess notability and give you a written summary of our findings.
3. Research. If we proceed, we gather and read the independent sources that will back every statement. If a fact has no reliable source, it stays out of the draft.
4. Drafting. We write a neutral, encyclopedic draft with citations, without promotional language.
5. Your review. You check the draft for factual accuracy. You do not control the final wording, because Wikipedia editors decide. You cannot require changes in the article text after it is submitted.
6. Submission and follow-up. The draft is submitted with a clear disclosure. We advise you on reviewer comments and policy questions, and help you respond politely and within the rules. Reviews can take weeks or longer.

Wikipedia requires anyone who is paid to edit, directly or indirectly, to disclose that relationship. The rules appear in the paid-contribution disclosure policy and the conflict of interest guideline. Editors with a conflict of interest are expected to use the draft and review process instead of editing a live page directly.

We follow these rules. Any paid work is disclosed in the way Wikipedia requires, and we do not operate hidden accounts. You should be wary of any service that tells you disclosure is optional. Undisclosed paid editing can lead to blocked accounts, deleted pages and damage to your reputation, and the resulting coverage can be far worse than having no page at all.

We quote each project individually after a free consultation, as a fixed written quote with no hidden fees. Pricing depends on how much research is needed, what the source audit finds, the number and complexity of sources, the length of the article and how much follow-up advice you want. See the pricing page for how our quotes work.

Timelines are confirmed in the written quote. Wikipedia review times vary and are outside our control, so we cannot give a date for acceptance. Rush schedules for our drafting work are available for an additional fee quoted up front. A notability check alone can be quoted separately if you only want the honest answer first.

The best Wikipedia writing services begin with honest advice, not a sales promise. Get a free consultation to find out whether your subject is ready, what sources you would need and what the project would cost. If you are not there yet, our book marketing and book publishing services can help build the independent coverage and credibility that matter.